考 IELTS 寫作最怕無方向、句式太重複？AfterSchool呢篇文章為你示範兩篇達 7.5–8 分的高分範文，並逐段分析為何得分。無論係 Opinion 題還是 Discussion 題，你都可以直接套用導師提供的「立場句＋承接句＋結尾句」模板，寫出高分邏輯文。 想知道更多IELTS Writing考試技巧？即撳：IELTS Writing 寫作全攻略｜Task 1 + Task 2 結構、評分重點 範文一（Opinion/To what extent）：Remote work boosts productivity 題目 Some people believe working from home improves productivity. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 範文 （約270字） - Introduction In recent years, remote work has become a hot topic across different industries. This trend has not only changed daily routines but also influenced how employees plan their tasks. Some people believe that working from home increases productivity, while others argue that it causes distraction and weak teamwork. This essay contends that remote work can raise productivity when teams set clear goals and communication rules, because structure reduces wasted time and supports deep focus. - Body 1 (Positive case) One strong reason is that home-based work reduces interruptions, which allows deeper concentration. In typical offices, workers face small talks, sudden meetings, and commuting stress. When employees work at home with a simple schedule and a quiet corner, they can start earlier and reserve long blocks for complex tasks. For example, during Hong Kong’s pandemic period, many staff finished writing and data tasks faster because they skipped travel and protected “focus hours.” Consequently, the same tasks required fewer hours and daily output increased. - Body 2 (Limitation/condition transition) Indeed, remote work does not always improve results; outcomes depend on clear targets and shared norms. Without common goals, teammates may duplicate work or wait for replies, which delays projects. A practical setup is weekly measurable goals, short daily check-ins, and one shared platform for files and feedback. For instance, a Singapore marketing team sped up campaigns after adopting a task board and “response time” rules. Therefore, productivity gains appear when structure guides teamwork instead of leaving it to chance. - Conclusion (future/policy angle) In conclusion, remote work can raise productivity if teams protect focus and define rules. As digital collaboration grows, companies should train staff in task planning and asynchronous communication so that efficiency becomes stable rather than temporary. 為什麼這篇達到7.5–8分？ - 明確立場＋條件化觀點。引言末句直接表態，並界定「何時有效」。 - 兩段主體各一核心鏈條；第二段用限制/條件承接，而非換話題。 - B2核心詞彙＋少量提升詞（measurable, asynchronous, duplicate work, shared norms），避免生僻難詞堆砌。 - 混合複合句、條件句與結果句；標點自然。 你可直接套用的模板 - 立場句：This essay contends that X increases Y when A and B, because C. - 段首主題句：One strong reason is that X reduces Y, which allows Z. - 限制承接：Indeed, X does not always…, outcomes depend on…. - 操作三件套：A practical setup is [goal] + [ritual] + [tool]. 立即診斷你的困難根源 1) 立場含糊：你是否只列利弊但未「條件化」你的立場？ 2) 主體跑題：一段是否出現兩個不同主張（出現“moreover”換點）？ 3) 例子抽象：是否缺少具體地點/場景/行為？ 立即報讀「IELTS寫作課程」：我將用「可複製立場模板」與「T–E–E–C單一主線模板」，強化你的寫作思維邏輯，讓段落更緊密。 立即了解更多 範文二（Discussion：Discuss both views + opinion）：Free university education 題目 Some argue that university education should be free, while others think students should pay tuition. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 範文 （約275字） - Introduction Recently, the rising cost of higher education has sparked widespread discussion. This issue has not only affected family budgets but also shaped career decisions among young people. Some people believe that free university promotes fairness and human capital, while others argue that tuition is needed to protect quality and efficient use of funds. This essay argues that a targeted model—free for low-income students and key fields—balances access with sustainability, because it supports equity without putting heavy pressure on public finance. - Body 1 (View A) Supporters of free university emphasize wider access and long-term public benefits. High tuition discourages capable students from less affluent families, reducing social mobility and wasting talent. When fees are removed for these students, they can focus on study instead of long part-time work, and completion becomes more likely. For example, after several European regions expanded need-based scholarships, families reported less pressure and more graduates entered healthcare and engineering roles. Therefore, targeted relief can open doors and serve economic needs. - Body 2 (View B + opinion integration) However, critics argue that universal free tuition can strain budgets and weaken incentives for quality. Without priorities, universities may expand low-value programmes while underfunding facilities and teaching. A more balanced approach is means-tested aid and free places in fields with strong public value, such as nursing and environmental engineering. In Hong Kong, focused subsidies for specific programmes help align training with labour demand. Hence, access improves most when assistance is directed rather than universal. - Conclusion (policy recommendation) To conclude, free university can advance fairness, yet blanket zero fees risk inefficiency. Policymakers should combine income-based support with strategic investment in high-need disciplines so that opportunity and quality rise together. 為什麼這篇達到7.5–8分 - 完整回應「討論雙方＋給出個人立場」。立場非居中搖擺，而是給「條件化方案」。 - 段際承接以「限制/條件」把反方與我的方案融合，避免兩段彼此孤立。 - 主題詞重述自然（access, equity, sustainability, labour demand），同義替換避免重複。 - 結構齊備讓步、條件、結果；句式多樣且清晰。 你可直接套用的模板 - 引言雙方：Some people believe X, while others argue Y. - 我的方案句：This essay argues that a targeted model—[A] and [B]—balances [M] with [N], because [reason]. - 政策句：A more balanced approach is [tool 1] and [tool 2]. - 結尾政策：Policymakers should combine X with Y so that Z. 立即診斷你的困難根源 1) “Discuss both”只寫一邊：是否缺一段完整呈現另一觀點？ 2) 立場缺方案：有表態但沒有「可操作」策略（工具成對：資助機制＋優先領域）。 3) 例子不落地：只談抽象公平，缺城市/行業/措施名。 4) 段際割裂：第二段未承接第一段的價值與限制。 報讀「IELTS寫作課程」：我們會生成你的「觀點句＋方案句」模板包，帶你把任意Discussion題昇華答案。 立即了解更多 Ielts 課程特色 對比式講解：學什麼、怎麼學、如何立即落地 教授結構策略 - Opinion題：立場從頭到尾一致，第二段用「限制/條件」深化。 - Discussion題：第一段呈現A觀點，第二段呈現B並融合我的解法。 段句展開技術（即套即用） - T–E–E–C順序固定，且E段三步：Characteristics → What’s next → Result；例子總是晚於展開。 - 段首信號詞：Opinion用“Indeed,”承接限制；Discussion用“However,”轉入反方＋解法。 解構常見失分點 - 立場空洞：用 because 後接具體機制詞，如 goals/rules, means-tested/targeted。 - 例子不可信：固定模板“City + group + action + outcome”，例如“Hong Kong graduates choose nursing after subsidy.” - 一段多點：若出現 moreover/furthermore 開新觀點，移至下一段或刪除。 報讀「IELTS寫作課程」：你能收穫什麼？ 個人錯誤報告 我會標記你最常犯的「段內雙主旨、例子前置、立場含糊」等型錯。 專屬模板包 依題型提供「立場句、限制承接句」等，可直接替換名詞使用。 寫作流程思維清單 審題—立場—兩條主線—模板填充—例子植入—結尾評論
